Current Trends in The Formation of Mathematical Terminology on An Online Platform

Seypullaev Jumabek (1), Kurbanbaev Tuwelbay (2), Arziev Allabay (3), Begench Geldibayev (4)
(1) Karakalpak State University, Ch.Abdirov Street 1, Nukus, 230100, Uzbekistan
(2) Karakalpak State University, Ch.Abdirov Street 1, Nukus, 230100, Uzbekistan
(3) Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, Ch.Abdirov Street 1, Nukus, 230100, Uzbekistan
(4) Tashkent University of Information Technologies, Amir Temur Avenue 108, Tashkent, 100084, Uzbekistan
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Jumabek, S., Tuwelbay, K., Allabay, A., & Geldibayev, B. (2024). Current Trends in The Formation of Mathematical Terminology on An Online Platform. International Journal of Advanced Science Computing and Engineering, 6(1), 7–12.

To monitor quality improvement and student learning outcomes, schools must adopt a Minimum Competency Assessment (MCA). The Minimal Competence Assessment consists of two sub-tests: literacy and numeracy. This is in accordance with the provisions of the Indonesian Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology in order to improve the quality of learning and student learning outcomes. The existing test method has limits with school resources that cannot satisfy the quota of pupils who can utilize the program jointly. In addition, the existing system is incapable of displaying student grades because the evaluation is a cumulative score for the whole student body. Hence, the school constructed a web service-based application utilizing the Representational State Transfer approaches so that it could independently administer complete numeracy and literacy assessments to its pupils, allowing schools to track their students' numeracy and literacy improvement. The system is constructed utilizing two distinct platforms, namely web-based apps and mobile applications based on Android. Web-based application was developed for admin and teachers while mobile application was developed for students. The findings of this study's testing indicated that the web service application performed as predicted. According to the findings of the questionnaires given to evaluate the application's usability using the Nielsen technique, teachers were happy with the application's Learnability, Memorability, Efficiency, Errors, and Satisfaction. The majority of instructors are satisfied with the implementation of this Minimum Competence Application, according to the survey findings.

M. C. Márquez and A. M. Porras, “Science Communication in Multiple Languages Is Critical to Its Effectiveness,” Frontiers in Communication, vol. 5, May 2020, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00031.

M. S. Di Bitetti and J. A. Ferreras, “Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications,” Ambio, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 121–127, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0820-7.

I.-A. Drobot, “Multilingualism and Awareness of Cultural Differences in Communication,” Multilingualism - Interdisciplinary Topics, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.99178.

P. Peng and X. Lin, “The relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance among fourth graders,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 69, pp. 11–21, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.006.

E.G. Sabirova, V.G. Zakirova. "Formation of Mathematical Terminology in Junior School Children". IEJME – Mathematics Education. 11:6 (2006): 1787-1795.

P. J. Riccomini, G. W. Smith, E. M. Hughes, and K. M. Fries, “The Language of Mathematics: The Importance of Teaching and Learning Mathematical Vocabulary,” Reading & Writing Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 235–252, May 2015, doi: 10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995.

S. R. Powell, M. K. Driver, G. Roberts, and A.-M. Fall, “An analysis of the mathematics vocabulary knowledge of third- and fifth-grade students: Connections to general vocabulary and mathematics computation,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 57, pp. 22–32, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.011.

X. Baymuratov, F. Japakova, O. Nurjanov. Matematika boyınsha tu´sindirme sozlik [Explanatory dictionary of Mathematics], Nukus, Uzbekistan: Bilim, 1993.

D. Damodaran B, S. Salim, and S. M. Vargese, “Performance Evaluation of MySQL and MongoDB Databases,” International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 387–394, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.5121/ijci.2016.5241.

C. A. Győrödi, D. V. Dumşe-Burescu, D. R. Zmaranda, R. Ş. Győrödi, G. A. Gabor, and G. D. Pecherle, “Performance Analysis of NoSQL and Relational Databases with CouchDB and MySQL for Application’s Data Storage,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 23, p. 8524, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10238524.

S. Palanisamy and P. SuvithaVani, “A survey on RDBMS and NoSQL Databases MySQL vs MongoDB,” 2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/iccci48352.2020.9104047.

M. M. Patil, A. Hanni, C. H. Tejeshwar, and P. Patil, “A qualitative analysis of the performance of MongoDB vs MySQL database based on insertion and retriewal operations using a web/android application to explore load balancing — Sharding in MongoDB and its advantages,” 2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1109/i-smac.2017.8058365.

P. Filip and L. Cegan, “Comparison of MySQL and MongoDB with focus on performance,” 2020 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS), Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1109/icimcis51567.2020.9354307.

DB-Engines. “DB-Engines Ranking - popularity ranking of database management systems.” Accessed: Dec. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available:

Statista. “Most popular database management systems 2023 | Statista.” Accessed: Dec. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available:

G. Petri. “A comparison of Oracle and MYSQL.” IOUG Sel. J. 1(2005). [Online]. Available:˜apsitis/java- eim/pdfs/003_OracleMySQL.pdf

“Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2021”. Accessed: Dec. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available:

Y. Bassil. “A Comparative Study on the Performance of the Top DBMS Systems.” J. Comput. Sci. Res. 1:1 (2012): 20–31. Accessed: Dec. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available:

M. Dawodi, M. H. Hedayati, J. A. Baktash, and A. L. Erfan, “Facebook MySQL Performance vs MySQL Performance,” 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1109/iemcon.2019.8936259.

“Matematika faniga oid atamalar va tushunchalar izohli lug’ati(A – D xarflar) Ta’lim/Obrazovanie.” [An explanatory dictionary of terms and concepts related to mathematics (letters A - D) – Education.”] Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“Matematika. Slovar.” [Mathematics. Dictionary] Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“Termini.” [Terms] Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“Kratkiy spravochnik matematicheskix terminov.” [A Quick Reference Guide to Mathematical Terms] Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“Prikladnaya matematika| reshenie zadach.” [Applied Mathematics | problem solving.] Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“Illustrated Mathematics Dictionary.” Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“Math Glossary: Mathematics Terms and Definitions.” Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“Mathwords.” Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:

“A-Z Math Vocabulary Words List, Math Dictionary, Math Definitions.” Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: