Beykoz Honor a Robust Online Exam Platform System
How to cite (IJASCE) :
In today’s digital landscape, online assessments have emerged as a pivotal element of educational systems worldwide. However, the rise of online examinations has also been accompanied by a troubling increase in cheating incidents. Research highlights that the most prevalent forms of online exam fraud include unauthorized access, screen sharing among students, and impersonation of test-takers. In response to these challenges, we introduce "Beykoz Honor," an innovative online exam platform meticulously engineered to incorporate a suite of advanced anti-cheating features. This platform employs multi-factor authentication (MFA) to ensure that only legitimate users can access assessments. Additionally, a browser lockdown mechanism restricts navigation away from the exam interface, while IP and device tracking enable monitoring of candidates to prevent fraudulent activity. Furthermore, question randomization adds another layer of integrity by altering the order and selection of exam questions for each student. Research has consistently shown that these comprehensive measures significantly mitigate the risks associated with academic dishonesty. This paper examines the architecture of the Beykoz Honor system, outlines its phased implementation strategy, and conducts a thorough market analysis with a particular focus on Turkish universities. Looking toward the future, we discuss ambitious plans to integrate artificial intelligence to detect irregularities during assessments. Real-time monitoring solutions are also on the horizon, adding yet another dimension to the platform's capability to uphold academic integrity. These innovations represent ongoing efforts to enhance the efficacy and reliability of online examinations, ensuring a fair and equitable assessment environment for all students.
A. Stocco, R. Yandrapally, and A. Mesbah, "Visual web test repair," in Proc. 26th ACM Joint Meeting Eur. Softw. Eng. Conf. Symp. Found. Softw. Eng. (ESEC/FSE), Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, Nov. 2018, pp. 503–514, doi: 10.1145/3236024.3236063.
G. J. Cizek, Cheating on Tests: How to Do It, Detect It, and Prevent It. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 1999.
E. Miller, "Website testing," Software Res., Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, Tech. Rep., 2005.
I. Kertusha, G. Assress, O. Duman, and A. Arcuri, "A survey on web testing: On the rise of AI and applications in industry," arXiv:2503.05378, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05378
Y.-F. Li, P. K. Das, and D. L. Dowe, "Two decades of web application testing—A survey of recent advances," Inf. Syst., vol. 43, pp. 20–54, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.is.2014.02.001.
R. Kelley and B. Dooley, "The technology of cheating," in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Ethics Sci., Technol. Eng., Chicago, IL, USA, 2014, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/ethics.2014.6893442.
G. Solomon and L. Schrum, Web 2.0: New Tools, New Schools. Eugene, OR, USA: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), 2007.
V. Florjančič, "The lockdown impact on students' successfulness," in Learn. Technol. Educ. Challenges (LTEC), L. Uden and D. Liberona, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022, pp. 185–198, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08890-2_15.
C. Goolsby-Cole et al., "Issues of question equivalence in online exam pools," J. College Sci. Teach., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 24–30, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1080/0047231x.2023.12290629.
V. Juričić and M. Obrvan, "Students' perception of AI generated exam questions," in Proc. 18th Int. Technol., Educ. Develop. Conf. (INTED), Valencia, Spain, Mar. 2024, pp. 1480–1487.
A. Baruah et al., "Ethical considerations in AI-powered student profiling for personalized learning," J. Inform. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2024.
A. Ullah, H. Xiao, and T. Barker, "A multi-factor authentication method for security of online examinations," in Proc. 2nd EAI Int. Conf. Smart Grid Internet Things (SGIoT), Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, Oct. 2018, pp. 155–168, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05928-6_13.
M. Petingola, Y. Zhang, Y. Yan, and W. Lin, "Integrating ethical AI tools into educational practices for enhancing academic integrity," in Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Conversational User Interfaces (CUI), Delft, Netherlands, Jul. 2025.
C. Mutimukwe et al., "Privacy in online proctoring systems in higher education: Stakeholders' perceptions, awareness and responsibility," J. Comput. Higher Educ., Early Access, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12528-025-09461-5.
A. Robles-Gómez et al., "Emulating and evaluating virtual remote laboratories for cybersecurity," Sensors, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 3011, May 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20113011.
D. Woldeab and T. Brothen, "Video surveillance of online exam proctoring: Exam anxiety and student performance," Int. J. E-Learn. Distance Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1204.
P. M. Elisabeta and M. R. Alexandru, "Comparative analysis of e-learning platforms on the market," in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Electron., Comput. Artif. Intell. (ECAI), Iasi, Romania, 2018, pp. 1–4, doi:10.1109/ecai.2018.8679004.
S. Gudiño Paredes, F. de J. Jasso Peña, and J. M. de La Fuente Alcazar, "Remote proctored exams: Integrity assurance in online education?," Distance Educ., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 200–218, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1080/01587919.2021.1910495.
X. Zhu and C. Cao, "Secure online examination with biometric authentication and blockchain-based framework," Math. Problems Eng., vol. 2021, pp. 1–12, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/5058780.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.